|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
26/05/2015 |
Actualizado : |
08/03/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Poster |
Autor : |
STIRLING, S.; DIAZ-LAGO, J.E.; PLA, M.; MENDOZA, A.; BRITOS, A.; BELTRÁN, A.; BERNARDI, F.; REPETTO, J.L.; CAJARVILLE, C. |
Afiliación : |
JUAN ENRIQUE DIAZ LAGO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARCELO PLA TEJERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALEJANDRO FRANCISCO MENDOZA AGUIAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE LUIS REPETTO CAPELLO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Efectos del estado fenológico sobre el rendimiento del cultivo las pérdidas y el pH del ensilaje de planta entera de Avena sativa. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In JORNADAS URUGUAYAS DE BUIATRÍA, 42., 2014, Paysandú, UY; ELIZONDO, V.; MATTO, C. (Ed.). [Trabajos presentados]: posters. Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría, 2014. |
Páginas : |
p. 243-245. |
ISSN : |
1688-6674. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
AVENA CANTARA; CALIDAD DE ENSILAJE; CONSERVACIÓN DE ENSILAJES; ENSILAJE DE PLANTA ENTERA; ESTADO FENOLÓGICO; EVALUACIÓN DEL MOMENTO DE CORTE; MOMENTO DE COSECHA. |
Thesagro : |
AVENA SATIVA; RENDIMIENTO DEL CULTIVO. |
Asunto categoría : |
Q52 Elaboración y preservación de alimentos para animales |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15279/1/JB2014-243-245.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01177nam a2200325 a 4500 001 1052678 005 2021-03-08 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1688-6674. 100 1 $aSTIRLING, S. 245 $aEfectos del estado fenológico sobre el rendimiento del cultivo las pérdidas y el pH del ensilaje de planta entera de Avena sativa.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn JORNADAS URUGUAYAS DE BUIATRÍA, 42., 2014, Paysandú, UY; ELIZONDO, V.; MATTO, C. (Ed.). [Trabajos presentados]: posters. Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría$c2014 300 $ap. 243-245. 650 $aAVENA SATIVA 650 $aRENDIMIENTO DEL CULTIVO 653 $aAVENA CANTARA 653 $aCALIDAD DE ENSILAJE 653 $aCONSERVACIÓN DE ENSILAJES 653 $aENSILAJE DE PLANTA ENTERA 653 $aESTADO FENOLÓGICO 653 $aEVALUACIÓN DEL MOMENTO DE CORTE 653 $aMOMENTO DE COSECHA 700 1 $aDIAZ-LAGO, J.E. 700 1 $aPLA, M. 700 1 $aMENDOZA, A. 700 1 $aBRITOS, A. 700 1 $aBELTRÁN, A. 700 1 $aBERNARDI, F. 700 1 $aREPETTO, J.L. 700 1 $aCAJARVILLE, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
22/04/2021 |
Actualizado : |
09/06/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; BARROS, A.T.M.; LUCAS, M.; KLAFKE, G.M.; DOMINGUES, L.N.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA CECILIA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANTONIO THADEU M. BARROS, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.; MARTÍN LUCAS FONSECA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.; GUILHERME M. KLAFKE, Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Brazil.; LUÍSA N. DOMINGUES, USDA-ARS Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory, 2700 Fredericksburg Road, Kerrville, TX, USA 78028.; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Susceptibility of field populations of Haematobia irritans to fipronil in Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, 2021, Volume 41, Article number e06821. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821 |
DOI : |
10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: 1 Received on December 4, 2020. Accepted for publication on December 16, 2020. Acknowledgments.- We would like to acknowledge Gonzalo Escayola, the
ranchers, the staff of the slaughterhouse and the interns who collaborated on this study. This work was supported by the ?Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria? (INIA), Uruguay, project number CL 35. |
Contenido : |
Fipronil was registered in Uruguay in 1997, and, since then, it has been used for the control of Haematobia irritans irritans and Rhipicephalus microplus. The susceptibility of H. irritants to this drug has not been evaluated. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the resistance of H. irritans to fipronil. Additionally, a survey was carried out with the farmers to evaluate the use of fipronil for H. irritans control in the ranches where the flies came from. For the bioassays, 31 field populations of H. irritans were exposed to 10 concentrations of fipronil (3.2-16.0?g.cm2 ), and their LC50 values were calculated using probit analysis. A bioassay was performed with horn flies from the susceptible colony maintained at the USDA-ARS Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory for comparison and calculation of resistance ratios (RRs). All 31 field populations surveyed in the study were susceptible to fipronil, with resistance ratios ranging from <0.5 to 2.2. Four populations with RRs >1 did not differ significantly from the susceptible strain. A single population showed an RR >2.2. Overall, the survey shows that fipronil was mostly used for R. microplus control, and in only three ranches, which were free of R. microplus, was fipronil used for horn fly control. Seventeen farmers did not use fipronil at all in the last three years. It is concluded that, in Uruguay, field populations of horn flies remain susceptible to fipronil. |
Palabras claves : |
BIOASSAYS; FIPRONIL; HEMATOBIA IRRITANS; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT. |
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15509/1/Miraballes-et-al-2021.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/j/pvb/a/s7F8dxtqmS8DRGQvK6ZFSpx/?lang=en&format=pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02688naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1061990 005 2021-06-09 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821$2DOI 100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C. 245 $aSusceptibility of field populations of Haematobia irritans to fipronil in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: 1 Received on December 4, 2020. Accepted for publication on December 16, 2020. Acknowledgments.- We would like to acknowledge Gonzalo Escayola, the ranchers, the staff of the slaughterhouse and the interns who collaborated on this study. This work was supported by the ?Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria? (INIA), Uruguay, project number CL 35. 520 $aFipronil was registered in Uruguay in 1997, and, since then, it has been used for the control of Haematobia irritans irritans and Rhipicephalus microplus. The susceptibility of H. irritants to this drug has not been evaluated. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the resistance of H. irritans to fipronil. Additionally, a survey was carried out with the farmers to evaluate the use of fipronil for H. irritans control in the ranches where the flies came from. For the bioassays, 31 field populations of H. irritans were exposed to 10 concentrations of fipronil (3.2-16.0?g.cm2 ), and their LC50 values were calculated using probit analysis. A bioassay was performed with horn flies from the susceptible colony maintained at the USDA-ARS Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory for comparison and calculation of resistance ratios (RRs). All 31 field populations surveyed in the study were susceptible to fipronil, with resistance ratios ranging from <0.5 to 2.2. Four populations with RRs >1 did not differ significantly from the susceptible strain. A single population showed an RR >2.2. Overall, the survey shows that fipronil was mostly used for R. microplus control, and in only three ranches, which were free of R. microplus, was fipronil used for horn fly control. Seventeen farmers did not use fipronil at all in the last three years. It is concluded that, in Uruguay, field populations of horn flies remain susceptible to fipronil. 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aBIOASSAYS 653 $aFIPRONIL 653 $aHEMATOBIA IRRITANS 653 $aINTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT 700 1 $aBARROS, A.T.M. 700 1 $aLUCAS, M. 700 1 $aKLAFKE, G.M. 700 1 $aDOMINGUES, L.N. 700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F. 773 $tPesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, 2021, Volume 41, Article number e06821. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|